site stats

Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013

WebbHolder, 562 F.3d 314 (5th Cir. 2009) Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit March 4, 2009 Also cited by 407 other opinions 1 reference to Carbajal-Gonzalez v. I.N.S., 78 F.3d 194 … Webb26 apr. 2016 · Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir.2013). II. Petitioner argues that the BIA erred in denying him withholding of removal by rejecting his claim that, because of his …

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH …

Webb14 sep. 2024 · Castillo-Martinez v. Garland, No. 20-60276 (5th Cir. 2024) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit sidefx houdini fx 19.0.383 win https://oishiiyatai.com

Jaco v. Garland 24 F.4th 395 5th Cir. Judgment Law CaseMine

Webb20 jan. 2014 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). We review the factual findings, including whether an alien is entitled to asylum, for substantial evidence, and will reverse only if the record compels a different finding. Id. To show that he is eligible for asylum, Gharti-Magar has the burden of WebbSharma, 729 F.3d at 411. nexus between his political opinion and the persecution, meaning that he must demonstrate through direct or circumstantial evidence that the persecutors knew of his political opinion and persecuted him … Webb18 mars 2015 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411-13 (5th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, he cannot make the more difficult showing of an objective "clear probability" that he will be … side fringe side parting shoulder length hair

De La Cruz v. Lynch, 819 F.3d 784 Casetext Search + Citator

Category:Sharma v. Holder, No. 12–60547. - Federal Cases - Case Law

Tags:Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013

Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH …

Webb20 jan. 2014 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). We review the factual findings, including whether an alien is entitled to asylum, for substantial evidence, and … WebbSharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 412 (5th Cir. 2013) Nexus/One Central Reason Matter of C-T-L-, 25 I&N Dec. 341 (BIA 2010) CAT Framework Garcia v. Holder, 756 F.3d 885, 891 …

Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013

Did you know?

Webb19 dec. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Because Martinez-Nataren has not shown that he is entitled to asylum, he cannot establish that he meets the higher standard for withholding for removal. See Majd v. … Webb22 mars 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a) (42) (A) ). The burden is on the applicant to present "specific, detailed facts" to demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear …

Webb12 okt. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 412-13 (5th Cir. 2013). Rather, the IJ found Katembo was targeted because of his occupation as an election worker. Next, although Katembo testified at his hearing that he was targeted because of his work with CENI, IJ determined based on his asylum the Webb8 jan. 2014 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). We review the factual findings, including whether an alien is entitled to asylum, for substantial evidence, and …

Webb22 feb. 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). The BIA’s finding is conclusive under that standard unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary. See id. Substantial evidence supports that the Garcia-Rojas sisters did not suffer past persecution. Webb3 mars 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Regarding the credibility issue, an adverse credibility determination is a factual finding. Singh v. Sessions, 880 …

729 F.3d 407 (5th Cir. 2013) In Sharma, the BIA had determined that the petitioner's mistreatment was motivated by legitimate reasons, and on appeal we readily observed the reasonableness of that conclusion. Visa mer The factual background of this case was established primarily through Sharma's own testimony, which the IJ found to be credible. Khagendra … Visa mer An alien is eligible for a discretionary grant of asylum if he qualifies as a refugee. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(A), (B)(i). A refugee is a person who is outside of his or her country and is unable or unwilling to return “because of … Visa mer “We review the decision of the BIA, and reach the underlying decision of the immigration judge only if that decision has some impact upon the BIA's opinion.” Ontunez–Tursios v. … Visa mer Accordingly, the petition for review is GRANTED, the BIA's decision is VACATED in part, the motion for stay of deportation pending review is GRANTED, and the case is REMANDED to the BIA for further proceedings … Visa mer

WebbFind many great new & used options and get the best deals for 2007 VOLVO C70 MK2 FRONT RIGHT DRIVER SIDE PILLAR TRIM COVER 1385359 at the best online prices at … sidefx houdini working unitsWebb17 jan. 2024 · Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013); Tamara-Gomez v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 343, 351 (5th Cir. 2006). The BIA also concluded that “married Honduran women … sidefx houdini version historyWebb19 dec. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Because Martinez-Nataren has not shown that he is entitled to asylum, he cannot establish that he meets the higher standard for withholding for removal. See Majd v. … sidefx houdini fx 19.0.589WebbSharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 413 (5th Cir. 2013 ). The standard for withholding of removal or CAT protection “is even higher than the standard for asylum, requiring a … the plane trailer 2023WebbSharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 413 (5th Cir. 2013). The person must support the claim with“specific, detailed facts showing a good reason to fear that he or she will be . singled out. for persecution.” Orellana–Monson, 685 F.3d at 518 (quoting . Faddoul v. INS, 37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994)). The the planet people of planet planetWebbHolder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). We review the factual findings, including whether an alien is entitled to asylum, for substantial evidence, and will reverse only if the record … the plane trailerWebb29 nov. 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (citations omitted). Un-der the substantial evidence standard, this court may not reverse a factual finding unless the evidence “compels” such a reversal — i.e., the evidence the plane train