Orif vs arthroplasty

Author: asau

August undefined, 2024

Witryna15 maj 2013 · Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) [4] are surgical treatment options used in the prevention and … WitrynaThe big question is: should the elbow be repaired or replaced? Elbow joint replacement is called an arthroplasty. Repair is done with an operation called open reduction and …

Acute total hip arthroplasty versus open reduction …

Witryna7 lis 2024 · Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most successful operation to be done and is definitely a rewarding procedure for both the surgeon and the patient. Ever since 3 days of low friction arthroplasty by Sir John Charnley, there has been considerable interest in improvement in the knowledge of surgical techniques and hip biomechanics. Witryna27 lip 2024 · Among them, the surgical methods for radial head fractures are mainly open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and radial head arthroplasty (RHA). It is believed that ORIF can achieve good clinical efficacy in restoring the anatomical structure of the radial head, but complications also arise, such as internal fixation loosening and nonunion. rolluperror unknown word

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect

Witryna1 wrz 2024 · Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of these fractures is viable but technically challenging and associated with a high complication rate. Recently, … Witryna29 cze 2024 · Mortality did not differ significantly between DFR and ORIF in nDFFx or pDFFx patients: 3.3% of patients died in 30 days following ORIF of nDFFx compared to 3.8% of those undergoing DFR, while 2.9% of pDFFx patient died following ORIF compared to 3.6% of those undergoing DFR. WitrynaPurpose: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and radial head arthroplasty (RHA) are the most common operative treatments in patients with radial head fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of RHA and ORIF treatments in patients with radial head fractures (modified Mason type III and IV). rollupoptions chunkfilenames

Open reduction internal fixation vs. reverse shoulder …

Orif vs arthroplasty

Demographics, Treatment, and Cost of Periprosthetic Femur …

WitrynaThe present review was conducted to determine the best surgical treatment for comminuted radial head when ORIF is not possible. Better outcomes are reported for radial head arthroplasty in terms of elbow stability, range of motion, pain, and fewer complications compared to radial head excision. WitrynaAcute arthroplasty has the theoretical advantage of earlier mobilization. We examined the outcomes of patients 70 years and older who underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) vs distal femoral replacement (DFR) for comminuted, intra-articular distal femur fractures.

Did you know?

Witryna26 wrz 2024 · There are concerns, however, that total hip arthroplasty has greater associated surgical morbidity than hemiarthroplasty and may increase the risk of … Witryna22 sie 2024 · ORIF patients were younger (p 0.001), more likely to be males (p 0.001), and had a lower Deyo score (p = 0.012). Both groups had comparable complication …

WitrynaASES score was higher in the acute RSA cohort compared to RSA after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (77.9 vs 63.5; p=0.008). The overall complication rate per 100 patient-years was 11.7 for the acute RSA cohort, and 18.5 for the delayed RSA cohort (RR: 0.55; p=0.015). Witrynaevery 100 pts treated with arthroplasty over ORIF. Rogmark, JBJSBr, 2002. RCT ORIF vs arthroplasty in age >70. • 2 year f/u, failure rate was 43% in the internal fixation group versus 6% in the arthroplasty group Keating, JBJS, 2006 compared ORIF with hemi and THA in pts >60yrs with displaced femoral neck. (They also compared ORIF …

Witryna19 lip 2024 · Introduction:Periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFX) are complications of both total hip and knee arthroplasty and may be treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision arthropl... Witryna7 cze 2024 · Surgical management strategies for complex proximal humerus fractures include open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or arthroplasty—either hemiarthroplasty (HA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). 2,4,7 –12 There is controversy regarding whether ORIF or HA is superior when treating complex …

WitrynaConclusion: The current study demonstrates good clinical outcomes for both RTSA and ORIF. However, reoperation rate was higher with ORIF with locked plating compared to RTSA for fracture with tuberosity repair in an age matched population. RTSA may be a better treat-ment option than ORIF for 3- and 4-part fractures in patients older than 65.

Witryna31 gru 2024 · Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the suitability of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with a cementless and metaphyseal stem fixation as a treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) with a calcar fragment when this may be fixed with a steel wire cerclage. rollupgroup power biWitryna22 sie 2024 · ORIF patients were younger than arthroplasty patients (48.6 ± 21.8 vs 64.9 ± 17.7, p < 0.001) with a lower Deyo score (0.41 ± 0.87 vs 0.7 ± 0.97, p = 0.012). … rolluphillsWitrynaORIF may be a viable option if bone stock is adequate around uncemented or tapered polished stems with an intact cement mantle and the fracture geometry allows stable anatomic reconstruction. Conceptional considerations support this idea, but more data are needed to identify outcome predictors. rollupoptions globals