WebMar 17, 2024 · How many bytes will a S9(8) COMP field occupy (7) About the MERGE verb, which one of the following is true (6) Which division is used to specify the computer used by the program (5) 01 test record 02 first pic x(4) 02 … WebExample 01 WS-VAR USAGE COMP-1. Q38) How many bytes does a S9(7) COMP-3 field occupy ? Q38) Will take 4 bytes. Sign is stored as hex value in the last nibble. General formula is INT((n/2) + 1)), where n=7 in this example. Q39) How many bytes does a S9(7) SIGN TRAILING SEPARATE field occupy ? Q39) Will occupy 8 bytes (one extra byte for …
Difference between 9(9) and s9(9) ?? -IBM Mainframes
WebJul 9, 2009 · COMP-3 fields length is calculated as number of digits that we need to store + 1 divided by 2. For example to store an numeric field of value 987 we would required 3 +1 divided by 2 = 2 Hence an Comp-3 field of length 2 bytes can store a value of +999 to -999 as the limit. 15 would stored as 01 5C. WebHow many bytes will a S9(8)... prev next How many bytes will a S9(8) COMP field occupy ? more than 6 months ago by anonymous Nasir Jawed. Dell India COBOL Team Lead/ Tech Lead. 258. UPVOTE (0) SHARE. Show More Answers (0) POST YOUR ANSWERS. Similar questions. Hardware, Software. importance of leadership in the 21st century
Calculating space for COMP variables -IBM Mainframes
WebApr 14, 2024 · 8 bytes. Was this answer useful? Yes MAGNO Aug 24th, 2016 There is no such length in cobol for comp. The max length is a full-word, which means S9 (08) comp. … WebOS/VS Cobol pgms can only run in 24 bit addressing mode, VS Cobol II pgms can run either in 24 bit or 31 bit addressing modes. Report writer is supported only in OS/VS Cobol. USAGE IS POINTER is supported only in VS COBOL II. Reference modification e.g.: WS-VAR (1:2) is supported only in VS COBOL II. EVALUATE is supported only in VS COBOL II. WebHow many bytes will a S9(8)... prev next How many bytes will a S9(8) COMP field occupy ? more than 6 months ago by anonymous Nasir Jawed. Dell India COBOL Team Lead/ Tech … importance of learner profiling